Standards & regulation

A Spyware Ad Ran On 120,000 Sites Through Vendors The Lists Vouched For. Apple’s ID Block Looks Different Now

Hamit Tümer ·2 min read·How we report Share Print
In this piece
    The seal vouched for it; nobody opened it.
    The seal vouched for it; nobody opened it.

    The story. Why is Apple blocking third-party identifiers on iOS? One column argues that part of the answer is ad tech’s own security record, not only platform gatekeeping. (AdExchanger, Data-Driven Thinking, 29 October 2026)

    01What happened

    • A spyware attack came through ads. On 15 October, Confiant and the University of Toronto’s Citizen Lab confirmed a zero-click mercenary spyware attack delivered through targeted ads, according to the column’s author, Alessandro De Zanche.
    • The scale was large. The ads ran on more than 120,000 websites and 70,000 apps. Al Jazeera staff were the targets.
    • The vendor was on the lists. Ad tech vendor Discover-Tech, linked to the spyware firm Candiru, sat on IAB Europe’s Global Vendor List from 2 July 2020 and on Google’s Certified External Vendors list.
    • The lists rely on self-attestation. Citizen Lab said vendor lists “appear to be largely based on self-attestation by vendors.” Google and IAB Europe acted only after the researchers disclosed.
    • Apple’s rule is old, its block is new. Apple has restricted mobile ad IDs, cookie IDs and IP addresses since ATT in 2021. Since iOS 27, WebKit also blocks domains it calls identity resolution infrastructure.
    • Apple’s process is the fair complaint. The column notes Apple has published no blocked-domain list and offers no appeal, and that Google could bid on iOS inventory in at least one case where The Trade Desk could not.

    02What it means inside a GAM network

    Most of this is a vendor-vetting story, and publishers sit inside it. Every demand partner reaching your Google Ad Manager inventory has been admitted by a list, a certification or a contract. The column’s point is that those lists rest on what vendors say about themselves.

    Earlier APH coverage of the Safari block treated it as an identity and revenue question. This column adds a second reading: Apple can argue it is acting on security grounds, which makes a quick reversal less likely. That is APH desk analysis, and the column is one opinion, not Apple’s statement.

    03What publishers should do about it

    04The bottom line

    The column ends “Don’t blame Apple. Evolve ad tech.” Publishers can take the practical half: tighten who gets into your auctions before a regulator or a platform does it for you.

    Sources & caveats

    Sources: AdExchanger, Data-Driven Thinking, “Can We Really Blame Apple For Blocking ID Tech?” by Alessandro De Zanche (29 October 2026), for the Confiant and Citizen Lab findings, the Discover-Tech listings, the Apple restrictions and the criticisms of Apple. The GAM framing and the recommendations are APH desk analysis.

    The weekly

    One letter a week, from the desk that runs the auctions.

    What actually moved in yield, CTV and curation across our publishers — written by the people who saw it, not a content team. No digests, no roundups, one email.

    One email a week. Unsubscribe in one click. We never share or sell the list.

    More from this issue

    Ran alongside this piece in the Weekly of 30 October 2026 —