Yield & pricing

Taboola And 51Degrees Just Added Two More Ad IDs. Publishers Still Don’t Have One Currency

Hakan Şimşek ·3 min read·How we report Share Print
In this piece
    Figure none of which interoperate with each other by default
    • RAMPID
    • UID2.0
    • ID5
    • CONNECTID
    • TRUAUDIENCE
    • PAYPAL ADS ID
    Publisher Desk

    The story. Taboola launched Realize ID on 22 September, and 51Degrees followed with its own identifier, 51Did, the same week — two new entrants into a post-cookie identity market that already runs LiveRamp’s RampID, The Trade Desk’s Unified ID 2.0, ID5, Yahoo ConnectID, TransUnion’s TruAudience and PayPal Ads ID. AdExchanger’s framing of the problem: advertisers want “a ubiquitous coin-of-the-realm-type ID,” and what they have instead is “credits at a Dave & Buster’s-esque chain with its own currency that you can only spend on site.” (AdExchanger, “More Alt IDs, More Problems,” Daily News Roundup, 23 September 2026)

    01What happened

    • Taboola’s Realize ID launched 22 September, pitched by CEO Adam Singolda as a tool “helping performance marketers capture and act on open web intent before it disappears” — an identity product built to preserve targetability as third-party signals decay.
    • 51Degrees released 51Did the same week, a data services company affiliated with the Movement for an Open Web entering a field AdExchanger describes as already crowded.
    • That brings the named field to at least eight alternative IDs, none of which interoperate with each other by default: RampID, UID2.0, ID5, ConnectID, TruAudience, PayPal Ads ID, and now Realize ID and 51Did.
    • AdExchanger’s own read is that this is fragmentation, not competition solving the problem. Each ID works inside its own walled ecosystem, closer to store credit than a shared currency, which means a publisher plugging in a new ID gains reach with that ID’s specific demand partners, not with the market broadly.

    02What it means inside a GAM network

    Every new alt-ID launch is pitched as solving identity resolution; what it actually solves is identity resolution for the demand that has already integrated with that specific ID. For a publisher running PPID and first-party data strategies inside GAM, the operational question was never “which ID is best” — it’s how many of these a stack can reasonably carry before integration and QA overhead outweighs the incremental demand each one unlocks. Realize ID’s pitch is squarely Taboola’s own demand-side reach; 51Did’s is whatever the Movement for an Open Web’s affiliated buyers bring. Neither is a market-wide fix, and stacking IDs without a floor-and-fill strategy behind each one is how a publisher ends up running eight parallel identity graphs for marginal gains on most of them. The operator question this desk keeps returning to on alt-ID stories: does adding this ID measurably lift matched-bid rate and win rate against your own first-party segments, or does it just add another vendor tag firing on every page.

    03What publishers should do about it

    04The bottom line

    This desk has covered the identity-fragmentation story from the yield-leak side and the agent side before; what’s new this week is concrete — two named launches, Realize ID and 51Did, in the same seven-day window, pushing the count of non-interoperable alt-IDs past eight. AdExchanger’s “credits at Dave & Buster’s” line is the accurate one: more currencies, still no common one, and the operator answer stays the same — build the first-party graph you control, and audit each alt-ID by the demand it actually resolves before adding the next.

    Sources & caveats

    Sources: AdExchanger, “More Alt IDs, More Problems; No Game Discs? Here, Have Some Ads Instead,” Daily News Roundup (23 September 2026) — for the Realize ID and 51Did launch details, the Singolda quote, and the named alt-ID landscape and “coin-of-the-realm” framing. The PPID and yield-operator guidance is APH desk analysis.

    The weekly

    One letter a week, from the desk that runs the auctions.

    What actually moved in yield, CTV and curation across our publishers — written by the people who saw it, not a content team. No digests, no roundups, one email.

    One email a week. Unsubscribe in one click. We never share or sell the list.

    More from this issue

    Ran alongside this piece in the Weekly of 23 September 2026 — read the whole issue →