Yield & pricing

A 15-Person Agency Pays The Trade Desk 17% And Its Reseller 12%. Publishers Should Read The Fee Stack

Atila Sak ·3 min read·How we report Share Print
In this piece
    Each layer of fees takes its share before the media is bought.
    Each layer of fees takes its share before the media is bought.

    The story. Independent agencies say big DSP spend has not bought them direct access or lower fees. Buying on The Trade Desk and Amazon DSP often carries two layers of fees, and agencies are cutting spend or pushing back. (Digiday, 21 October 2026; AdExchanger, 22 October 2026)

    01What happened

    • A 15-person New York agency. It cleared The Trade Desk’s $100,000 monthly spend bar last summer and still pays 17% to the DSP plus 12% to the reseller Mogl.
    • It has cut back. The agency said The Trade Desk will not allow direct buying or change its fees, so it reduced its Trade Desk spend to very little. It did not disclose the current figure.
    • A 25-person Washington state agency. It pays a 10% reseller fee on top of Amazon’s 15% fee. It was told that committing to a specific budget is the way to a direct seat.
    • A Texas agency of about 20 staff. It buys Amazon through a reseller while negotiating a direct seat. Its executive called the experience “shifting sand”: resellers first, then a minimum, then no minimum.
    • Buyers’ verdict. Ten media buyers described the reseller route to Digiday as “a toll booth with no exit”.
    • The platforms’ answers. Amazon says there is no minimum spend for ads and some advertisers prefer paid service partners. The Trade Desk says direct seats carry commitment levels agreed per client and that others can use certified resellers, including Goodway Group and Mogl.
    • The defence. The Trade Desk argues higher upfront costs are justified by performance. CEO Jeff Green said on the 6 August earnings call that rivals’ buyers focus on price rather than value.

    02What it means inside a GAM network

    None of this is a publisher’s fee, and publishers do not see it. It still shapes what reaches you.

    Take the New York agency’s figures. If both fees are charged on gross spend, which Digiday’s account does not specify, 29 cents of each dollar is gone before a bid is placed and 71 cents is left to buy media. The Washington agency’s 25% would leave 75. An agency with that arithmetic has a reason to push for cheaper inventory and to look for ways round the stack.

    That is where a publisher feels it. Spend moves between DSPs when the toll becomes too visible, and the agency that cut its Trade Desk buying has not stopped buying. It has moved to wherever its margin survives. Your deals and floors in Ad Manager need to work in whichever DSP the budget lands.

    The roundup also notes that DSP fees for small agencies are unlikely to improve soon. So expect the same pressure at the next renewal: lower clearing prices on open exchange, more requests for curated and private deals, and more questions about which supply path is the shortest.

    A fair counterpoint: the Trade Desk’s case is that its fee buys performance, and some buyers do pay it willingly. We have only the agencies’ side of the dollar figures; neither DSP gave its own.

    Fees that publishers never see still move budgets that publishers do see.

    03What publishers should do about it

    04The bottom line

    Fees that publishers never see still move budgets that publishers do see. Read the fee stack as a forecast of where agency spend goes next, and be present there with the same deal.

    Sources & caveats

    Sources: Digiday, “Indie agencies want The Trade Desk and Amazon DSP to acknowledge their buying power with negotiating leverage” (Kimeko McCoy, 21 October 2026), for every agency fee, spend and quote figure and the Amazon and Trade Desk responses. AdExchanger Daily News Roundup (22 October 2026), for the roundup’s summary of the story. The roundup also cites an AdExchanger payment-leniency story, which on reading is a March 2020 article; we have not used it. The 71-cent and 75-cent figures are APH arithmetic on the reported percentages, assuming fees on gross spend. The recommendations are APH desk analysis.

    The weekly

    One letter a week, from the desk that runs the auctions.

    What actually moved in yield, CTV and curation across our publishers — written by the people who saw it, not a content team. No digests, no roundups, one email.

    One email a week. Unsubscribe in one click. We never share or sell the list.

    More from this issue

    Ran alongside this piece in the Weekly of 22 October 2026 —