Yield & pricing

Forrester’s First SSP Ranking in a Decade Calls Google a 'Challenger' — Read That Twice

APH Programmatic Desk ·3 min read Share Print
In this piece
    Figure The three points the piece sets out Why this matters →
    1. 01

      It legitimizes looking beyond Google on the sell side.

    2. 02

      It reflects a genuinely competitive sell-side market.

    3. 03

      It compounds with the antitrust timeline.

    Programmatic Desk

    Analyst rankings rarely make headlines. This one should. Forrester released its first SSP (supply-side platform) Wave since 2014 — and ranked Google, the company that has defined and dominated the sell side for a generation, as merely a “Challenger.” For an industry built around the assumption that Google’s sell-side stack is the gravitational center, that’s a genuine repricing of reality.

    01What happened

    After more than a decade without a formal SSP evaluation, Forrester re-entered the category and assessed the field — and Google did not land in the leader tier. It was ranked a challenger, the rung below leaders. The context is impossible to ignore: Google’s sell-side ad-tech business is the subject of federal antitrust charges, with a court having already found it illegally monopolized ad exchanges and publisher ad servers, and a remedy ruling (potentially a divestiture of AdX) pending (see our antitrust piece). An analyst signaling that Google’s product and strategy position has slipped — independent of the legal cloud — is a notable shift in how the market reads the sell side.

    02Why this matters

    It legitimizes looking beyond Google on the sell sideFor years, "use Google's stack" was the safe default no one got fired for. A major analyst ranking Google below the leaders gives publishers cover — and a data point — to seriously evaluate independent SSPs on the merits.
    It reflects a genuinely competitive sell-side marketA challenger ranking for Google implies real leaders elsewhere. That competition is good for publishers: more credible alternatives means more leverage on fees, features, and transparency.
    It compounds with the antitrust timelineProduct-position erosion plus a possible forced divestiture plus a giant choosing to interoperate via Prebid (Amazon) all point the same way: the sell side is becoming less Google-centric. Publishers who diversify early capture the upside; those who wait inherit whatever the remedy and the market hand them.
    Forrester didn't break Google's sell-side dominance — courts, competitors, and Google's own AI distraction are doing that.

    03What publishers should do

    04What marketers should do

    05The bottom line

    Forrester didn’t break Google’s sell-side dominance — courts, competitors, and Google’s own AI distraction are doing that. But the first SSP Wave in twelve years putting Google in the challenger tier is a milestone in perception, and perception drives procurement. The sell side is no longer a one-name market. For publishers, that’s the most encouraging structural shift in years — provided you actually act on it.

    Sources & caveats

    Sources: AdExchanger (“Independent Ad Tech Is Reframing Itself Around Cloud Hardware” and SSP-wave coverage noting Forrester ranked Google a challenger); Forrester Wave: SSPs (2026, first since 2014). Note: confirm tier wording and methodology against Forrester’s published report before quoting.

    The weekly

    One letter a week, from the desk that runs the auctions.

    What actually moved in yield, CTV and curation across our publishers — written by the people who saw it, not a content team. No digests, no roundups, one email.

    One email a week. Unsubscribe in one click. We never share or sell the list.

    More from this issue

    Ran alongside this piece in the Weekly of 16 June 2026 — read the whole issue →