Yield & pricing

Ad Agencies Just Started Auditing Their Own AI Agents for Overcharging

Oğuz Şimşek ·3 min read Share Print
In this piece
    Figure Gartner's April survey of 1,300 senior marketers found 56% of companies still implement AI tools without clear usage…
    56%of companies
    Marketing Desk

    Media agencies that turned AI agents loose on media buying are now building audit trails to catch the agents overspending. Dept’s global EVP of technology, Jonathan Whiteside, told Digiday his staff have burned through 1.5 million tokens in a single day — the kind of run-up that pushed Dept, performance agency Rise, and others to instrument what their agents actually do, not just what they’re told to do.

    01What the audit layer actually catches

    • Token spend without a budget. Gartner’s April survey of 1,300 senior marketers found 56% of companies still implement AI tools without clear usage policies. Gartner projects 60% of AI-using organizations will face cost overruns from missing usage tracking.
    • Model choice, not just volume. Gartner analyst Nicole Greene says rising token consumption costs come from staff not choosing the right model for the task. Dept’s fix is an “AI gateway” that removes the ability to pick a model per task, routing work into a cost-appropriate default instead.
    • The audit tool is coming from the sell side. Rise has been testing agentic media buying with a supermarket client since June using an audit-log feature built by PubMatic — an SSP, not a DSP or agency vendor — that flags when an agent is “drifting” outside pre-set parameters and time-stamps every change it makes, including how the change was made.
    • Guardrails over punishment. Brainlabs CEO Daniel Gilbert frames the monitoring as enabling, not restrictive — the goal is more spend, done well, with visibility framed as existential for operations rather than a brake on activity.

    02What it means inside a GAM network

    The detail worth sitting with: the accountability layer for agentic buying is being built by an SSP, not by the agencies spending the money or the DSPs routing their bids. PubMatic’s tool logs agent behavior — parameter drift, timestamped changes, the reasoning behind an action — on the sell side of the transaction, for buy-side clients to consult. If that pattern holds as agentic buying scales into GAM/AdX auctions, publisher-side ops teams aren’t just watching yield; they may end up running the audit trail the agency side depends on to prove its own agents behaved. Rise’s group director, Klaudia Smykowska, described using the log to reconstruct what happened and why after an agent made an unexplained pricing change.

    Nobody in this story is arguing agentic buying should slow down — Brainlabs' Gilbert is explicit that the goal is more spend, done usefully.

    03What publishers and buyers should do

    04The bottom line

    Nobody in this story is arguing agentic buying should slow down — Brainlabs’ Gilbert is explicit that the goal is more spend, done usefully. But the fact that an SSP built the accountability tooling, not the agencies themselves, is the tell: as agentic systems start placing real bids inside real auctions, the audit trail is turning into sell-side infrastructure. A GAM operator that isn’t already asking what its own platform logs about agent-driven bidding is behind a question its agency partners are already answering.


    Digiday, “Media agencies build audit tools to prevent AI agents from overcharging” (4 September 2026), for the agency-side reporting, figures, and quotes. The publisher/GAM operator analysis is APH desk analysis.

    The weekly

    One letter a week, from the desk that runs the auctions.

    What actually moved in yield, CTV and curation across our publishers — written by the people who saw it, not a content team. No digests, no roundups, one email.

    One email a week. Unsubscribe in one click. We never share or sell the list.

    More from this issue

    Ran alongside this piece in the Weekly of 4 September 2026 —